Welcome back Data Under Glass, your weekly strategic intelligence extracted from real battlefield deployments, packaged for leaders who need to win, not just understand.

Over the past 8 years, I've rebuilt compensation structures for my startup and other startups hemorrhaging key talent. The pattern is unmistakable: 31% annual attrition in Lagos tech isn't a market reality you accept, it's an execution tax that caps your growth ceiling before you hit product-market fit.

Most founders budget replacement costs at 1x salary. The true number? $180,000+ per senior engineer. That's what walks out the door when you lose institutional knowledge, burn 6 months on recruitment, and train someone who leaves in 18 months with skills you paid for.

Today, you're getting the Retention Economics Playbook—why every cash-heavy compensation structure is doomed, how equity creates the four-year economic tether you actually need, and the operator story that cut churn from 45% to 18%, saving $2.1M in year one.

— Anderson Oz'.

From The Operator's Desk

Case In Point: Cross-border fintech (Series A, venture-backed) scaling payments infrastructure

Problem: Lost 7 senior engineers in 9 months. Annualized attrition: 45%. At $180K per replacement, that's $1.26M in uncontrolled bleed.

Diagnosis:

  • Comp model: Cash-heavy, above-market base (80th percentile), guaranteed retention bonuses

  • Zero meaningful equity (token <0.05% grants perceived as insulting)

  • No vesting structure = no economic commitment device

  • Competing against remote offers at $3K-$7K USD monthly (3x local comp)

Intervention:

Eliminated short-term retention bonuses. Adjusted base from 80th to 65th percentile (still competitive). Freed 15% of comp budget to fund equity pool at 12% of fully diluted cap table. Allocated meaningful grants: 0.15% to 0.4% for senior engineers, 0.08% to 0.12% for mid-level.

Structure: 4-year vest, 1-year cliff, quarterly release. Documented option agreements with clear strike prices and exit scenarios. Monthly all-hands showing valuation trajectory and equity value projections.

Outcome:

Churn dropped 45% → 18% (60% reduction). Saved $2.1M in replacement costs year one. Zero senior departures in 18 months post-implementation.

The insight: Grant size mattered less than vesting expectation. Senior talent traded $5K USD monthly offers for 0.25% of a company they believed would hit $200M+ valuation. When employees calculate net worth in "shares owned" rather than "salary earned," you've built the economic tether that survives competitive poaching.

The $180K Replacement Reality

Median compensation for Senior Software Engineer in Nigeria: $22,636 USD annually. True replacement cost: $180,000+ (8x median salary).

Direct Recruitment: $15,000: Search fees, interview cycles consuming 40+ management hours, technical assessments.

Onboarding & Training: $25,000: Three months of reduced productivity, 250+ hours of senior engineer mentoring time at fully loaded cost.

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to Data Under Glass to continue reading.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found